[kwlug-disc] definition of debian's "stable"?
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Sun Aug 16 12:40:20 EDT 2009
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Andrew Sullivan Cant wrote:
> Yup.
>
> If you install from the the latest ISO ...
that being 5.0.2
> you should get the same system as if you installed from the first
> ISO ...
that being 5.0
> and ran 'apt-get dist-upgrade'.
or possibly just "apt-get upgrade" or "apt-get safe-upgrade"? after
all, if you're staying within the bounds of a single stable release,
what is the benefit of "dist-upgrade" over "safe-upgrade"? would
there actually be a difference between those two?
> I am not so familiar with Fedora terminology, but I had thought that
> a "re-spin" was a custom distro for a specificy purpose. Similar to
> the Ubuntu customized versions. (e.g., Kbuntu, mythbuntu) If a
> re-spin is just a new point release is there a term for a custom
> distro?
as i understand it (and i'm fairly sure i do), a "spin" is a
customized version, like the XFCE spin or something like that. a
"respin" is an updated version that incorporates all of the updates
since the original release, just to save you all that downloading
time.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CustomSpins
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
More information about the kwlug-disc
mailing list