[kwlug-disc] YouTube for audio

[Raul Suarez]

Have you thought of Youtube itself?

You can create a "video" with a still picture of the candidate as background.


Raul Suarez

Technology consultant
Software, Hardware and Practices
_________________
Twitter: rarsamx
http://rarsa.blogspot.com/ 
An eclectic collection of random thoughts


--- On Wed, 10/6/10, Paul Nijjar <paul_nijjar at yahoo.ca> wrote:

> From: Paul Nijjar <paul_nijjar at yahoo.ca>
> Subject: Re: [kwlug-disc] YouTube for audio
> To: "KWLUG discussion" <kwlug-disc at kwlug.org>
> Received: Wednesday, October 6, 2010, 11:22 PM
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:32:58PM
> -0400, Bob Jonkman wrote:
> > You'll probably want to set up an account at Jamendo
> and upload the
> > music you've composed/performed there: http://jamendo.com/en/upload
> > 
> As I said to Bob in person, this is not music. It is
> intended to be
> audio for these all-candidates meetings. 
> 
> Are there any other suggestions? I am not sure we are going
> to be able
> to self-host. archive.org is probably the leading
> candidate. I would
> be highly interest in hearing of others (or if you want to
> offer some
> high-bandwidth hosting that will kill your bandwidth, that
> would be
> cool too.) 
> 
> But since this is political material (and will consist of
> audio of
> other people) I am concerned about which licence to use,
> and I am
> concerned about the material being on the Internet
> forever[0]. 
> 
> I would like people to download an entire audio stream, and
> be able to
> share it if they want on faster sites than archive.org .
> But I imagine
> that the candidates might rebel at allowing derivative
> works, since
> then people can make mash-ups of their answers and (more
> importantly)
> take those answers out of context. 
> 
> I am tempted to say that the highly-restrictive Creative
> Commons
> licence with no derivative works, noncommercial usage only
> and
> attribution would be the best. I am not sure what the
> noncommercial
> buys you, though. 
> 
> If I self-hosted then I would probably leave the audio
> files up on the
> Internet until the election, and then take them down. My
> goal here is
> to give people who don't attend these meetings information
> they can
> use to make a choice on October 25, not necessarily to
> provide a
> historical archive of all-candidates debates. 
> 
> I also do not know what the lag time will be for material
> posted to
> archive.org . Is it measurable in days? Weeks? Hours? 
> 
> Experiences and/or advice would be welcome. Uploading
> multimedia is
> totally new to me. 
> 
> - Paul
> 
> 
> [0] Yes, once anything gets on the internet it is
> supposedly out in
> the world forever. Try reminding me of that when I am
> looking for a
> resource that was hosted on a single host that has gone
> down, and
> where every other source just points to the original.
> 
> --
> http://pnijjar.freeshell.org - Now with Waterloo
> election info
> 
> All-candidates meetings Oct 12, 13, 19 at Queen Street
> Commons; see 
> http://www.theworkingcentre.org/pub/2010/2010-10-allcandidates.pdf
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kwlug-disc_kwlug.org mailing list
> kwlug-disc_kwlug.org at kwlug.org
> http://astoria.ccjclearline.com/mailman/listinfo/kwlug-disc_kwlug.org
>