[kwlug-disc] Any experience with cloudatcost.com VPS?

[Bob Jonkman]

Andrew Sullivan Cant wrote:
> hmmm actually I wonder if anyone from Fibretech is on this list, and 
> might be interested in giving a presentation about what they are
> doing?

If we're having commercial vendors come in, I'd like to see it as a
vendor shootout.  Bring in three competitors, each can pitch to the
crowd for 30 minutes (with 15 min between presentations to mop up the
blood).

Locally, in addition to Fibrenetics we also have Sentex and Execulink
with hosting packages.  None of them are Big Media (ie. Bell or Rogers),
so they'll be pitching to a friendly crowd.

--Bob.


On 13-11-17 05:05 PM, Andrew Sullivan Cant wrote:
> Thanks for the thoughts.
> 
> I think I might give it a try too. This only thing I am running on
> my current VPS are 2 extremely small and static, sites so this will
> be a better fit for that scenario. (at $35, if this last more than ~
> 6 months I'll save money :) And we'll see how it works out before
> doing other things with them.
> 
> 
> hmmm actually I wonder if anyone from Fibretech is on this list, and 
> might be interested in giving a presentation about what they are
> doing?
> 
> Would anyone else be interested in such a presentation, if I try to
> get in touch with Fibretech/Cloudatcost?
> 
> Andrew
> 
> 
> On 11/11/13 12:55, Andrew Kohlsmith (mailing lists account) wrote:
>> On Nov 10, 2013, at 7:48 PM, Jonathan D. Poole
>> <jpoole at digitaljedi.ca> wrote:
>>> That model is broken IMHO, or they just don't care until they
>>> sell off the first 10k.  Sell fast, to get the name out, or sell
>>> fast and watch it die once it's all sold.  Tell me about the
>>> network performance/cpu performance once they're under some
>>> load/sell the 10,000.
>>> 
>>> However, they are called 'Developer 1/2/3' which could mean there
>>> is some fine print on what you can do with them.  Proof of
>>> concept development ideas, a box to throw crap on, sure, but for
>>> anything legit, no thanks.
>> 
>> Completely agreed on all points, which is why I’m just seeing what
>> it can do and not using it for anything important.
>> 
>> -A.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ kwlug-disc mailing
>> list kwlug-disc at kwlug.org 
>> http://kwlug.org/mailman/listinfo/kwlug-disc_kwlug.org
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ kwlug-disc mailing
> list kwlug-disc at kwlug.org 
> http://kwlug.org/mailman/listinfo/kwlug-disc_kwlug.org
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://kwlug.org/pipermail/kwlug-disc_kwlug.org/attachments/20131117/bb1f6ace/attachment.sig>