[kwlug-disc] Secure IM news

[B. S.]

> it would be ideal that we try and find a system that they can't have
> one centralized location to squat in and collect our metadata.

Does that not exist already in Tor?


On 11/26/2016 11:51 AM, Chamunks wrote:
>
> That said I think you're right it would be ideal that we try and find
> a system that they can't have one centralized location to squat in
> and collect our metadata.  I think that at this point though having a
> properly encrypted means / standard of conversation we can work on
> tools that wrap around Signal or something that provides anonymity.
> Although federation would definitely be ideal.  I think that it's
> kind of frustrating that I must have a cell phone number in order to
> validate my Signal account.
>
.
.
.