[kwlug-disc] Small, ARM64-based computers (was: Raspberry pi 4)
Francisco Dominguez
fxdoming at gmail.com
Tue Dec 7 15:27:35 EST 2021
Looks promising but the video support seems like a big gap…
Warning: Software for the Quartz64 is still early in development, and therefore currently lacks features such as the ability to produce video output. You are strongly encouraged to procure a 3.3V UART serial adapter capable of running at 1.5 mbauds, such as the woodpecker if you want to use a Quartz64 at this stage.
Francisco
fxdoming at gmail.com
> On Dec 7, 2021, at 2:29 PM, Rick Moen <rick at linuxmafia.com> wrote:
>
> Quoting Ronald Barnes (ron at ronaldbarnes.ca):
>
> [Pine64 Quartz SoC, https://wiki.pine64.org/wiki/Quartz64 :]
>
>> That PCIe expansion slot is intriguing!
>
> In sub-model A. There's also sub-model B, which offers M.2.
>
>> The value of which cannot be overstated. Adding expansion storage
>> to my rPi 4 would be more expensive than anticipated and somewhat of
>> a hassle.
>
> The 8GB LPDDR4 RAM option is likewise getting up into real-computer
> territory, and I note that sub-model A also has one (1) SATA 3.0 header.
> The immediately preceding ROCKPro64 SoC
> (https://wiki.pine64.org/wiki/ROCKPro64) also merits respect, but maxes
> out at 4GB LPDDR4 RAM.
>
> I keep watching the ARM single-board computer marketplace for units
> fully suited to home-server usage, and ideally want the hardware to
> include:
>
> o 8 GB or greater RAM, so that I can comfortably run a pair of VMs
> under a hardened small host system. There are certainly other
> ways to do this, but the two-VMs model provides a production server
> host alongside an in-development beta host that will be rolled out
> on flag day by simply promoting (re-IPing) the beta to production,
> and starting a new beta VM.
>
> o RAID1 redundant main storage on something better/faster/more-reliable than
> USB 3.0-attached or microSD or eMMC storage. Like, guys? NVMe SSD
> storage on an M.2 slot is a terrific idea, but why not two slots, please?
>
> o Fanless, silent, and low-power, which is where ARM64 helps.
>
> The generally meritorious hardkernel.com ODROID SoCs mentioned upthread
> share with the Pine64 being less limited than the RPis, but to my
> knowledge none of their units yet ticks all of my checkboxes for an
> in-home server platform.
>
> The marketplace doesn't recognise the existence of a home-server niche
> (which is understandable, as those of us who want robust computing
> infrastructure at home are "rara avibus". Over the last decade, the
> niche that seemed closest to filling home-server needs, it seemes to me,
> has been the HTPC (home theatre PC) one, like low-power AMD-based
> mini-ITX boxes with a pair of SATA drives. With the rise of ARM64 /
> aarch64, we are now seeing additional possibles.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kwlug-disc mailing list
> kwlug-disc at kwlug.org
> https://kwlug.org/mailman/listinfo/kwlug-disc_kwlug.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kwlug.org/pipermail/kwlug-disc_kwlug.org/attachments/20211207/b6dd956c/attachment.htm>
More information about the kwlug-disc
mailing list