<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CA+TuoW2=Ds0ep7ZXXGmhZtsHt93qAT0L4UUmx3qtk=oCOtjqHw@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Snap is a
            non issue on Xubuntu or Ubuntu Server LTS.</div>
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">You just
            do:</div>
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">   sudo apt
            purge snapd</div>
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">And it is
            gone forever.</div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>[on server] Except LXD with newer version that also runs VMs was
      snappy, needing undated and snappy ZFS version, if I am not
      mistaken, and that was ... unusual, but following standard on
      Ubuntu ...., that we've just replaced with Debian Trixie under our
      webconference.kwlug.org instance.</p>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CA+TuoW2=Ds0ep7ZXXGmhZtsHt93qAT0L4UUmx3qtk=oCOtjqHw@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">All of my
            systems are snap free, be they desktops or servers.</div>
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Only on the
            GNOME variants is it an issue because there are dependencies
            that prevent its removal.</div>
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">(Or so I
            have seen in past discussions).</div>
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">On Wed, Nov
            26, 2025 at 10:49\u202fPM Chris Irwin via kwlug-disc &lt;<a
              href="mailto:kwlug-disc@kwlug.org" moz-do-not-send="true"
              class="moz-txt-link-freetext">kwlug-disc@kwlug.org</a>&gt;
            wrote:</div>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container">
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On
            Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 02:27:11PM -0800, Ron wrote:<br>
            &gt;Chris Irwin via kwlug-disc wrote on 2025-11-26 13:30:<br>
            &gt;<br>
            &gt;&gt;That said, I don't know what you're actually getting
            vs just <br>
            &gt;&gt;standard Ubuntu nowdays.<br>
            &gt;<br>
            &gt;Agreed, but I expect the answer is "no Snaps", even
            though there's <br>
            &gt;nothing really wrong with them.<br>
            <br>
            Ah, didn't even cross my mind. I dropped Ubuntu for Fedora
            just before <br>
            the snap era - when they were doing buggy GTK+ patches that
            caused weird <br>
            issues and forging ahead with Unity.<br>
            <br>
            Yeah, maybe Mint is the way to go -- Ubuntu minus snaps,
            even if there's <br>
            a whole extra step in the chain.</blockquote>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>